Home / 2017 / Are we certain about which measure of intolerance of uncertainty to use yet?

Are we certain about which measure of intolerance of uncertainty to use yet?

Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) has been understood as a dispositional tendency to view the presence of negative events as unacceptable and threatening, regardless of the likelihood of those events occurring. The preference over the 12-item vs. 27-item of the IUS has been central to debate. The goals of the present study were to evaluate two competing models of measuring IU with model-fitting analyses and explore model invariance of gender (e.g. men vs. women). A sample of 980 individuals completed an online IUS survey. Results indicated that the two-factor short-form model provided better fit to the data compared to the full-length two-factor model proposed by. Results also indicated that the short-form IUS is gender invariant, suggesting acceptable use among men and women. These findings provide further support of a two-factor structure and suggest that the IUS is appropriate for men and women.

Read the full paper: Roma, V. G., & Hope, D. A. (2017). Are we certain about which measure of intolerance of uncertainty to use yet?. Cognitive behaviour therapy, 46(4), 327-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2016.1252792

Photo by: Neil Cummings

Check Also

Adherence predictors in an Internet-based Intervention program for depression

60% of patients with depression are attended in the Spanish Primary Care. Nevertheless, half of …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *